Collaboration Blueprint
The Collaboration Blueprint is a kick-off sequence for a mixed project team in which members state what they bring, get and need, ask each other in turn what is expected of them, and record the resulting agreements on one page. It comes from the tool 'Onboarding in Transdisciplinary Collaboration' by Rosanne van Wieringen and Silke van Beekum in the Transition Makers Toolbox at the University of Amsterdam, where it is used for teams of students, a teacher and an external partner. Its distinctive step is a round in which each person asks the others 'What do you expect from me?' and only listens.
Facilitation script
- 1
Informal get-together with coffee and, if useful, a short icebreaker so that members of the different parties mix.
30 min - 2
Orientation: everyone writes what they bring, what they get and what they need, one item per sticky note, then shares in turn.
30 min - 3
Mutual expectations: each member in turn asks 'What do you expect from me?'. A note-taker records every expectation on a sticky note. The asker only asks clarifying questions.
30 min - 4
Align: cluster notes into similarities and differences, turn similarities into working agreements, and work out compromises on the differences that can be bridged.
20 min - 5
Blueprint: agree the main goal, the success criteria and why the collaboration matters, and write them on the template with the working agreements.
30 min - 6
Create a team symbol, phrase or pose, add it to the blueprint and decide where the page will live and when it will be reviewed.
15 min
Tips
Let the person with the most formal authority ask 'What do you expect from me?' first; it signals that the question is real and makes it easier for others to be direct.
Protect the rule that the asker only clarifies, because the round collapses the moment someone starts justifying themselves.
In the alignment step, spend your time on the differences.
The similarities take care of themselves.
Common pitfalls
The asker responds to each expectation as it is voiced: the round becomes a negotiation, later speakers soften what they say and the honest expectations stay hidden
Only the junior members ask the question: the exercise then confirms the hierarchy, and expectations toward the lead or the client never get stated
Vague expectations such as 'good communication' are accepted: the working agreements built on them cannot be checked and settle nothing when the first deadline slips
Differences are skipped because the similarities feel good: the unaddressed gaps return as friction a few weeks into the project
The blueprint is filed and never looked at again: agreements drift, and new members join without knowing they exist
Variations
For a client project, replace the three academic roles with the parties actually present, for example client sponsor, delivery team and subcontractor, and have people answer the expectations question by role where the group is larger than ten. A shorter version of about 90 minutes drops the informal start and the team symbol. Online, use a shared whiteboard with one frame per person for the expectations round and stay in plenary, with no breakouts, so that everyone hears every answer. If the team already has working agreements, run only the expectations round and update the existing document.
Where it fits
When to use it
A project team brings together people from different organisations or disciplines who have not worked together before
Roles differ in power or status, such as client and supplier or teacher and student, and unspoken expectations are likely
A single team of four to ten people can give two and a half hours to its start
An external partner is joining and both sides are unsure what the other wants from them
Earlier projects between these parties suffered from mismatched assumptions about availability, quality or decision rights
When not to use it
Several functions or departments need to state needs to each other at once: What I Need From You (WINFY) is built for 3 to 7 groups and runs faster
The team is homogeneous and already knows each other well: a plain Working Agreements session of 30 to 45 minutes is enough
You need a full picture of purpose, values, roles and goals for a long-lived team: use the Team Canvas
Key people, especially the external partner or the sponsor, cannot attend: expectations voiced about an absent person do not bind them
There is an open conflict in the group: the expectations round will turn into accusation, so deal with the conflict first with a mediated conversation
Related methods
Frequently asked questions
What is Collaboration Blueprint?▾
The Collaboration Blueprint is a kick-off sequence of about two and a half hours for a mixed project team, together with the one-page document it produces. Members share what they bring, get and need, ask each other 'What do you expect from me?', turn the answers into working agreements and record goal, success criteria and a team symbol. It comes from the Transition Makers Toolbox tool 'Onboarding in Transdisciplinary Collaboration'.
How is it different from a working agreements session?▾
A standard working agreements session collects suggestions for how the whole team should behave. The Collaboration Blueprint adds a role-by-role round in which each person hears what the others expect from them specifically, which surfaces mismatches between parties that general norms would hide. The agreements at the end are built from those expectations.
How does it compare with What I Need From You (WINFY)?▾
WINFY works with several functional groups: each states its needs to the others and gets a yes, no, or similar short answer. The Collaboration Blueprint is for one small team, reverses the direction by having each person ask what is expected of them, and ends in a written agreement. Use WINFY across departments and the blueprint inside a single project team.
Who should be in the room?▾
Everyone who will work in the collaboration, including the external partner and whoever holds authority over the project. In the source, that means students, their teacher and the partner organisation. Four to ten people is workable; beyond that the expectations round takes too long.
What goes on the blueprint page?▾
The main goal of the collaboration, the criteria by which the team will judge success, a sentence on why it matters, the working agreements and the team's symbol, phrase or pose. Keep it to one page so that it can be pinned up or opened at the start of meetings, and set a date to review it.
Plan your next workshop with AI
Workshop Weaver helps you combine methods like Collaboration Blueprint into a complete, timed agenda in minutes.
Try it freeMethod descriptions on Workshop Weaver are original content written by our team, based on established facilitation practices. This method was inspired by work from Rosanne van Wieringen and Silke van Beekum, Transition Makers Toolbox (University of Amsterdam).