DecisionIntermédiaire

Gradients of Agreement

Developed by Sam Kaner, this tool maps participant support for a proposal on a seven-point spectrum from 'Whole-hearted endorsement' to 'Block'. Unlike binary yes/no votes, it reveals the texture of group opinion — enabling the facilitator to see if apparent consensus masks quiet reservations or if opposition is soft or fundamental.

Durée

10m–30m

Taille du groupe

3–30 people

Matériel

printed or drawn scale (1–7), sticky notes or cards

Source

Community

Comment l'animer

1
Present the proposal clearly.
2
Display the seven-point scale: 1 = Whole-hearted support; 2 = Endorsement with minor reservations; 3 = Support with reservations I want noted; 4 = Abstain (I'll support whatever the group decides); 5 = Reservations too significant to stay silent; 6 = Strong disagreement; 7 = Block (I cannot support this).
3
Each participant privately writes their number on a card or sticky note.
4
Reveal simultaneously.
5
Invite 5s, 6s, and 7s to share their concerns.
6
Adjust the proposal to address concerns and re-poll until the group reaches an acceptable consensus (usually everyone at 4 or below).

Conseils

The block (7) is not a veto — it's a signal that something fundamental has been missed.
Treat it as information, not obstruction.
A group of 2s and 3s is often more actionable than a mixed 1–6 result.

Variantes

Simplify to a 5-point scale for quicker use. Run anonymously using polling software for sensitive decisions.

Contextes d'utilisation

Strategic decisionsPolicy adoptionConsent-based governanceConflict resolution

🪡

Planifiez votre prochain atelier avec l'IA

Workshop Weaver vous aide à combiner des méthodes comme Gradients of Agreement en un agenda complet et minuté en quelques minutes.

Essayer gratuitement

Method descriptions on Workshop Weaver are original content written by our team, based on established facilitation practices.