Toutes les méthodes
DecisionDébutant

Dot Voting

A democratic prioritisation technique where each participant receives a fixed number of votes (represented by dot stickers or marks) to allocate across a set of options. Options with the most dots rise to the top. It's fast, visual, and bypasses lengthy verbal debate, making it one of the most-used tools in facilitation.

Durée
5m–20m
Taille du groupe
2–100 people
Matériel
sticky dots or markers, list of options on a board
Source
Community

Déroulé d'animation

  1. 1

    Display all options on a board or wall and walk through each briefly so every participant knows what they mean.

    3 min
  2. 2

    Hand out the dots — a good default is votes equal to roughly one third of the number of options — and state the stacking rule explicitly.

    2 min
  3. 3

    Invite everyone to vote at the same time. Simultaneous voting reduces anchoring on early votes.

    5 min
  4. 4

    Count the dots together, rank the options, and mark the cut-off line for what moves forward.

    3 min
  5. 5

    Sanity-check the result with the group: ask whether anything critical fell below the line and capture objections before closing.

    5 min

Conseils

  • Decide upfront whether participants can stack all their dots on one option — allowing it creates stronger signal but can be gamed.

  • For sensitive topics, run a 'blind vote' where everyone places dots simultaneously.

Pièges courants

  • Announcing the stacking rule after voting has started — changing rules mid-vote invalidates early votes and frustrates the room

  • Letting participants vote one after another instead of simultaneously, which anchors later voters on earlier dots

  • Treating the dot count as the final decision rather than a prioritisation signal that still needs a feasibility check

  • Using dot voting on two or three options — it adds ceremony without adding information

Variantes

Use coloured dots to distinguish votes by role or seniority. Run 'reverse dot voting' — give everyone red dots to mark options they strongly oppose. Dotmocracy can be adapted for remote voting using digital platforms that allow for similar dot-based selection.

Contextes d'utilisation

Prioritising backlogsSelecting workshop topicsNarrowing down ideas after brainstormingFeature prioritisationteam brainstormingproject prioritizationfeedback on proposalsevaluating event ideaschoosing team activities

Quand l'utiliser

  • A brainstorm or ideation round has produced more options than the group can discuss in depth

  • You need a fast, visible read on group preference before committing facilitation time to the top candidates

  • The group is large or mixed-seniority and you want every voice weighted equally

  • Energy is dipping and a physical, low-stakes activity will re-engage the room

Quand ne pas l'utiliser

  • The decision is high-stakes or binding — dot voting measures preference, not feasibility or evidence

  • Options differ on multiple competing dimensions; use an Impact/Effort Matrix or weighted scoring instead

  • The group is smaller than four people — a short structured discussion is faster and richer

  • Strong hierarchy is present and votes are public; anonymous formats prevent follow-the-boss voting

Méthodes associées

Pour aller plus loin

Questions fréquemment posées

How many dots should each participant get in dot voting?

A common rule of thumb is one third of the number of options, rounded down — so 12 options means 4 dots per person. Fewer dots force sharper prioritisation; more dots produce flatter, less decisive results.

Should participants be allowed to put all their dots on one option?

Decide before voting starts and announce it. Allowing stacking lets people express strong preference and surfaces passionate support; forbidding it spreads attention and produces a broader ranking. Both are valid — changing the rule mid-vote is not.

How long does a dot voting session take?

Typically 5–20 minutes end to end: a short walkthrough of the options, simultaneous voting, and a count with a brief sanity check of the ranking.

Is dot voting suitable for final decisions?

No — it measures group preference, not feasibility or evidence. Use it to narrow a long list, then apply a deeper method such as an Impact/Effort Matrix or weighted scoring to the shortlist before committing.

What do I need to run dot voting remotely?

Any shared board that supports stamps or emoji reactions works. Keep the mechanics identical: fixed vote budget, an explicit stacking rule, and simultaneous voting — most whiteboard tools support a private-voting mode that prevents anchoring.

🪡

Planifiez votre prochain atelier avec l'IA

Workshop Weaver vous aide à combiner des méthodes comme Dot Voting en un agenda complet et minuté en quelques minutes.

Essayer gratuitement

Method descriptions on Workshop Weaver are original content written by our team, based on established facilitation practices.