DecisionIntermediate

Gradients of Agreement

Developed by Sam Kaner, this tool maps participant support for a proposal on a seven-point spectrum from 'Whole-hearted endorsement' to 'Block'. Unlike binary yes/no votes, it reveals the texture of group opinion — enabling the facilitator to see if apparent consensus masks quiet reservations or if opposition is soft or fundamental.

Duration

10m–30m

Group size

3–30 people

Materials

printed or drawn scale (1–7), sticky notes or cards

Origin

Community

How to run it

1
Present the proposal clearly.
2
Display the seven-point scale: 1 = Whole-hearted support; 2 = Endorsement with minor reservations; 3 = Support with reservations I want noted; 4 = Abstain (I'll support whatever the group decides); 5 = Reservations too significant to stay silent; 6 = Strong disagreement; 7 = Block (I cannot support this).
3
Each participant privately writes their number on a card or sticky note.
4
Reveal simultaneously.
5
Invite 5s, 6s, and 7s to share their concerns.
6
Adjust the proposal to address concerns and re-poll until the group reaches an acceptable consensus (usually everyone at 4 or below).

Tips

The block (7) is not a veto — it's a signal that something fundamental has been missed.
Treat it as information, not obstruction.
A group of 2s and 3s is often more actionable than a mixed 1–6 result.

Variations

Simplify to a 5-point scale for quicker use. Run anonymously using polling software for sensitive decisions.

Where it fits

Strategic decisionsPolicy adoptionConsent-based governanceConflict resolution

🪡

Plan your next workshop with AI

Workshop Weaver helps you combine methods like Gradients of Agreement into a complete, timed agenda in minutes.

Try it free

Method descriptions on Workshop Weaver are original content written by our team, based on established facilitation practices.